Suchergebnisse

Now I will be on leave from work for a week, I will have time to observe this topic more. It is certain that the PC works very well this way, no lag, stutter, nothing. What is also certain is that the 54x is weaker, so less power, relatively, but less temperature. Of course, it requires less...

Of course, I understand what you write, but the V/F does not allow "large" unbervolt by itself. At 54x, 1.09V is sufficient, but -0.155 offset ~1.16V. I would like to push this even lower, as stress tests prove that 1.09V is the lower limit, where it is still error-free. V/F no longer works with...

This is not a cut, this is still regulation. It's true, the voltage is pushed down, but that's why there are 2 cores 57x. This keeps the upper limit high. Of course, I recommend this as an option, it's worth a try. If it doesn't work, it doesn't, we tried it. As you can see, I've had many, many...

I don't have an RGB kit, I only have this one. What I can say about it is that 6400MHz is the last frequency that auto RTT/ODTs can boot. I emphasize that this is a Klevv kit that I have, it is possible that it is faulty. I don't rule it out. It is certain that starting with DDR5 is not the best...

Try out 0.28, and 0.26, and 0.24. Maybe you can go to low Vcore.

Sorry, I wasn't careful enough. Indeed 54x, only the Vcore is high. You can move it to your heart's content with AC LL as long as it is stable. Me is 0.25 I don't have a picture of it at the moment, I'm at work. Night shift. This cpu is 40mV better. Yeah, I don't do it. I leave it to a routine...

(y) Hello! Thank you everything is good. I hope you too. I like the CPU, the hope attached to it has been fulfilled. Old cpu needs 1.09V, new cpu needs 1.05V for 54x. One thing was not built, the direct die. At the last moment, I lost interest in dd. The old proven version remains. Now I'm...

Ich teile jetzt eine Erfahrung darüber, wie empfindlich der LGA1700-Sockel ist. Ich habe die CPUs gewechselt, weil ich eine andere gekauft habe. Im Moment habe ich nebenbei die alte CPU umgebaut, die viele Tests bestanden hat. Natürlich ist es nicht stabil, es ist unmöglich, es zweimal auf die...

@Veii That's great... I'm not happy right now. The CPU I bought is uncapped. Prepared for DD. I was going to install it next week. I have a "million" questions now. In short, my history, as I have been using CPUs with satisfaction for years. Buying a CPU, I like it, so I'll keep it. A friend...

@Mtorrent I prepared 3 tests for you with Vcore/Watt. If the Vcore is unnecessarily high, it will heat up unnecessarily and consume a lot of electricity. 1.20V 292W 1.17V 276W 1.15V 265W I raised the frequency on purpose, because Hungarian forums are also laughing at why 54x. Because that...

Ok, I'm also interested in how it works for you. You are in luck with the SP105. Why is this good? I already recognized it, I tested the minimum values for my cpu for a couple of frequencies. For me, the minimum Vcore (Vmin) for the 54x Y Cruncher is 1.09V. Less is enough for you, so it's...

This sounds stupid, but I tested the test :) It is very important for Y Cruncher to rule out cpu instability. You can find errors in the same way on 54 or 55x. I think the 57x is a naive, bad decision by Intel. It is possible to do a "lite load" boost in combination with TVB, but I don't want to...

Hi Mtorrent! Thanks. These are all attempts to replace "auto". Not so long ago, I also did a 6-hour long test, then it was auto. I would like to know what is the correct value and what is the minimum stable value. For the CPU topic: Yes, I have set safety limits for emergencies. I can't reach...

So, CMDVRefUP 112 ist die untere Grenze. 110 hat mich am 36. mins Error, 111 geht bestimmt nicht (nie probiert), und 112 ist der Winner. Natuerlich 120 war gut, das ist das 99.99% safety Wert.

Good morning! I read your post several times. You consider the frequency reduction to 57 57 56 56 55 55 54 54 instead of the factory default (57 57 60 60 60 57 57 57) to be one of the "main problems". Yes, in this case I cut the Curve, I don't use the full scale. If I just type it like this...

I will write a long post on this topic. This is long, the tests are also long, sorry, even my post is slow. One thing is very important. CMDVrefUP, which we started with, is good. No one told me, but I started CMDVrefDn, which was a bad idea. Unfortunately, 20-30 minutes of testing is not...

Hello! CMDVREFUP, I'm 99% sure it works fine, but DOWN is 99% sure it doesn't. I'll check it out, but I'll wait for your advice. It wasn't a good idea for me to figure out what would be good in an arbitrary style. This week is now the long week, night shift until Sunday. I finish on Monday...

Thanks I read it with sadness. This job is not as simple as I thought. I'm sorry now that I can't find the value of CMDVrefDn. I'll fix my post right away, Y Cruncher has an error. I put it back to auto, 90 minutes run was restored immediately. Of course, but I made a special curve...

Wenn Jemand manuell die Spannungen gibt (vdd/q), muss vddq training aus. Es macht Störung, falsch training wenn an ist. Wenn ich es gut verstanden habe.

Status Update: CMDVrefDn: 20=2.5b error 10=2.5b error 30=BSOD 40=2.5b error 50=2x training loop, 2.5b 45.284s VST error 7. minute 60=2.5b 45.328s VT3 error 14. minute 70=2.5b 45.362s 22. minute pass, 1.25/1.39 bits/sec *10^10 ///EDIT: VST error ///Edit: 80= 38 minute later error 50 is very...