X909
Urgestein
Thread Starter
- Mitglied seit
- 27.06.2005
- Beiträge
- 4.539
- Desktop System
- X909
- Laptop
- M909
- Prozessor
- 14900KS - 6.2 / 4.8 / 5.4 Ghz
- Mainboard
- ASUS Z790 Apex Encore, 1703
- Kühler
- Thermal Grizzly Mycro Direct-Die, Aquaduct XT 360 + MoRa 360
- Speicher
- 2x24 GB G.Skill 8200 @ 8533 36-49-42-62 & scharfe Subtimings
- Grafikprozessor
- GeForce RTX4090 FE > 3 Ghz / 24.4 Gbps @ Alphacooooool
- Display
- Samsung PS64F8500 :D, Pimax 8kx, LG27UK850
- SSD
- 1 TB WD SN850X + 2x2 TB WD SN850X @ RAID0 + WD SN520 Müllhalde
- HDD
- 12 TB WD Elements Backupdrive
- Gehäuse
- Jonsbo U4 Plus Silver
- Netzteil
- Seasonic TX-1000
- Betriebssystem
- Win 11 Pro
- Internet
- ▼560 MBit ▲120 MBit
Da der P4 bei SuperPI bekanntlich kaum an den P-M bzw. A64 rankommt, interessiert mich, ob dies generell auf Numbercrunching zutrifft. Seti lief damals auf meinem Northwood eigentlich ziemlich schnell.
Mich würden daher mal euere P95 Benchmarks intessieren, das Tool sollte ja weit verbreitet sein. Ich benutze V 24.14 des Original P95 Clients.
Folgenden Text habe ich meiner results.txt im Prime Verzeichnis entnommen:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 4005.01 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 16 KB
L2 cache size: 2048 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 32-bit version 24.14, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 512K FFT length: 11.898 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 15.251 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 18.679 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 22.840 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.002 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 32.075 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 38.785 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 46.905 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 51.953 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 68.726 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 82.744 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 100.201 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 110.910 ms.
Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 6.957 ms.
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 6.871 ms.
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 6.900 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 6.918 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 9.600 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 9.585 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 11.018 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 10.988 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 10.857 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 10.969 ms.
Würde mich über Vergleichswerte freuen.
Mich würden daher mal euere P95 Benchmarks intessieren, das Tool sollte ja weit verbreitet sein. Ich benutze V 24.14 des Original P95 Clients.
Folgenden Text habe ich meiner results.txt im Prime Verzeichnis entnommen:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 4005.01 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 16 KB
L2 cache size: 2048 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 32-bit version 24.14, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 512K FFT length: 11.898 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 15.251 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 18.679 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 22.840 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.002 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 32.075 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 38.785 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 46.905 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 51.953 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 68.726 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 82.744 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 100.201 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 110.910 ms.
Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 6.957 ms.
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 6.871 ms.
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 6.900 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 6.918 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 9.600 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 9.585 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 11.018 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 10.988 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 10.857 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 10.969 ms.
Würde mich über Vergleichswerte freuen.