Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Anmerkung: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Die sind erstmal uninteressant - ich weiss, dass die Ami´s irgendwie taub sind!l1qu1d schrieb:Auch den Unterschied der dB-Zahlen?
ProCooling schrieb:The NexXxoS XP fares extremely well in this dT vs. flow graph, although it is extremely restrictive. The maximum flow rate I could achieve was 1.42 GPM with the Alphacool waterblock, which makes it the most restrictive waterblock I have tested. Conventional wisdom is that this doesn't matter because the Alphacool (and other European waterblocks for that matter) are "designed for low flow". If one looks at the above graph, these comments don't seem to be valid. One can see that the performance curve of the NexXxoS XP is similar to the Cascade and Storm G4 and that progressing from a flow rate of 0.5GPM to 1.4GPM yields about 3C of additional cooling. Compare that with the Swiftech MCW6000; which benefits around 1C for the same flow rate increase. In fact the relatively thin baseplate and accelerator nozzle make the NexXxoS block perform extremely well at higher flow rates, but it is not especially well-suited to flow rates below 0.5-0.75 GPM.
Snoopy69 schrieb:Kennt jmd Test, Vergleiche, Sites etc., wo US Wakü vs. EURO Wakü getestet wurden?
Ich wüsste da gerne mal die Unterschiede in Delta T...
st0ne-i schrieb:da sie auf zwei verschiedenen konzepten beruhen...
die europäer (zu 80% deutsche firmen) versuchen bei den gegebenen standart-schläuchen und pumpen (10/8mm und 8/6mm) das bestmögliche kühlprinzip zu erzeugen, deswegen erscheinen alle paar zeiten neue techniken ala microstruktur, und düsenkühlung usw..
krueml_ schrieb:Würd mal gerne wissen, wie die Kühlleistung mit einer Technik àla Mikrostruktur & Düsentechnik und dem Amidurchfluss wäre..