Im Artikel werden die Quellen InternetArchive, ZLibrary und Libgen genannt, die sind alle 3 frei verfügbar, also nix von wegen "Schwarzkopien".
Da sagen diverse Quellen etwas anderes.
For those unfamiliar, LibGen—or Library Genesis—is essentially a digital warehouse of stolen intellectual property, neatly stacked with pirated books, academic papers, and various works authors and publishers never approved.
Meta used millions of pirated books to train its latest AI model, Llama 3. All this raises questions about Mark Zuckerberg's leadership style.
www.forbes.com
The Authors Guild has collaborated with publishers and the federal government to combat major piracy websites that cost authors millions in lost sales. We
took down Z-Library and more than 250 mirror sites, successfully sued Kiss Library, and assisted publishers in
actions against LibGen, resulting in blocked U.S. domains and multi-million-dollar fines. These sites remain challenging to permanently eliminate as they operate from Russia or Ukraine—beyond U.S. jurisdiction—and quickly migrate to new domains when blocked.
The company reportedly pushed ahead with its LLM development despite knowing it was breaking copyright law.
www.socialmediatoday.com
Edit: Dazu passend die Aussage von Meta
“Meta claims, ‘There is no evidence that a market for licensing books to train LLMs’ exists, and there is ‘no economically feasible mechanism for Meta or other LLM developers to obtain licensed copies.’
Meta claims that unauthorized LLM training on copyrighted material is 'fair use.' The AAP says, 'Meta’s claims are patently false.'
publishingperspectives.com
The authors
sued Meta in 2023, arguing that it used
pirated versions of their books to train Llama without their permission. Meta responded on Monday that its AI training was protected by the legal doctrine of fair use, which allows for the unauthorized use of copyrighted material under certain circumstances.
