Ich habe euch mal ein paar wichtige Stellen vom Google Übersetzer zusammengeschnitten:
"Overclocking to 165 Hz
Overclocking consists of a simple slider in the screen and what you change the monitor's maximum frequency, the next step above 120 Hz as shown in the menus. You can choose 144, 150, 155, 160 and 165 Hz and is thus not guaranteed that all will work with your particular graphics card. Any change requires that the screen makes a reboot. So much more than that is not the overclocking feature.
Overclock to 165 Hz requires a GTX 960 card or newer to operate.
One explanation may be that the card based on the older and simpler graphics chips simply are limited in how wide pixel clock they can generate. Asus PG279Q uses a reduced timing compared with the VESA standard and requires at 144 Hz a pixel clock of nearly 570 MHz. At 165 Hz requires the 656 MHz pixel clock. Most likely only reach GTX 960 card and better up to that level.
Latency and lag
Latency, the delay of the picture is just under two milliseconds. It is low so-called "input lag" and is located on the accuracy limit we can achieve with the software SMTT2 and a CRT screen. Since taking the crystals additional 6-7 milliseconds in which to achieve clearly of light transmitted by Overdrive Normal setting.
Total delay, display team, is therefore approximately 8 milliseconds. We have seen displays that are somewhat faster, especially when the TN panels having shorter response. Most displays modern gaming screens, however, at these levels, 1-2 milliseconds of latency and electronic delay before the first faint change of the crystals are visible. Since upwards of 8 milliseconds to get full light transmission.
It will be the very trained minds and strong belief in the power of digits to notice some important differences between the screens in this class. Via HDMI, it is more delay with a latency of about 7 milliseconds and the total delay of approximately 15 milliseconds. Still a low delay.
120 Hz optimally, 165 Hz lagging more
Eftersläpen and nature also varies with the refresh rate. Higher frequency is not automatically better. As we can see is 60 Hz, a significantly smetigare experience than 120Hz and up. At 144 Hz and 165 Hz becomes the moment's sharper. Though it simultaneously becomes more lagging where 165 Hz lagging more than 144 Hz. Optimal level seems clearly to be 120 Hz, where we have the least lagging.*
ULMB for sharper movements
The brightness drops about 15-20 percent if you follow the suggested settings for more color accurate image in the section on color reproduction. ULMB in other words, a half or more of brightness. But then there are quite a lot of light resources to get out of the panel's lighting, it is a minor problem. 160 cd / m 2 is still a bit too high for a really dark room, for example.
Reflective Filter and angles
Asus PG279Q using a dull glare is clearly without drawing a structure over the image. You may not reflect you or any of your screen. The filter itself is quite effective against the side reflectors but can pick up light from the surroundings. Do you have a light wall behind you signed your vague silhouette against a diffuse and reflection of light from the wall.
The advantage of PG279Q is reflective filter does not disturb the picture or fold like a film in front. The downside is that warm yellow indoor lighting picked up and settles as a light brownish film over the dark areas of the picture.
Colour reproduction
Straight up and down running PG279Q an image mode named Racing Mode. Apparently Racing fashion that the majority second computer monitors usually called the default mode, that is the most color-accurate and appropriate mode to use.
From the start measures Racing fashion an image that balances against the turquoise. There is too much green and blue in the mixture. This can be easily remedied by selecting the Color Temp: Warm, which still slightly green blue but not as disturbing turquoise. Colour reproduction follows the ITU Rec.709 / HDTV standard very well. The colors are basically right in this situation.
The tone curve, "gamma" follows a certain inverted S-curve where dark hues are slightly whitened. This contributes to a clearer impression of the subtleties in dark parts of the picture. Uppljusningen is not problematic large firm compared to a normal and expected tone curve corresponding to 2.2 gamma is a little lost contrast impression. Some monitors offer a Gamma setting to select options but it is not at PG279Q."
*hier ist kein Lag, sondern ein verschmieren des Bildes gemeint, schätze ich
@Über mir: Soweit ich das verstanden habe hat der Monitor den für das G-Sync Modul üblichen Lag von 1-2 ms , ein voller Wechsel der Pixel - also bis der am längsten brauchende Farbton vollständig verändert wurde - braucht jedoch bis zu 8 ms. Ich hoffe mal TFTCentral oder Prad.de bekommen bald ein Testexemplar und klären das.
