[Sammelthread] Sockel 939 / 940 / 754 - Thread

4000+ San Diego
 

Anhänge

  • 4000+ cpu.jpg
    4000+ cpu.jpg
    89,2 KB · Aufrufe: 45
  • 612fa74d-e055-463e-9c18-76dff4b7ac9a.jpg
    612fa74d-e055-463e-9c18-76dff4b7ac9a.jpg
    137 KB · Aufrufe: 48
Wenn Du diese Anzeige nicht sehen willst, registriere Dich und/oder logge Dich ein.
I am not sure why you won't use more then multi 15x. Because that would limit you hugely with max fsb which gets less with more cold. With a higher multi it will do better speeds.
 
Probably OPB as in OnePageBook, the overlocker who at some point got banned from XS?

Many years have passed, and some people know about the bad relationship between Fugger and OPB. As was typical, Fugger used his "black hand" on many occasions to discredit OPB’s results, using his influence. This happened in cases like his results with 3k06 or PcMark. People asked OPB how he did it, but he never wanted to publicly explain his tweaking process—only to please the man with the black hand. He was banned from HWBOT and insulted by some, since, because he didn't explain how he achieved his results, they labeled him a cheater.

opb-001.jpg


The OCX team respects OPB decision; his long-standing work in tweaking matters remained solely within the team
For example, at the "Campus Party Valencia" event in 2010 and 2011, Massman, K404, and Joe_cool, No_name, etc... were invited. Several world records were achieved, such as in PcMark, using OPB's famous tweaks. It was verified that there was nothing illegal involved.

As of today, many former key members of Team OCX are now part of other teams, using the legacy of tweaks from Team OCX. They haven't received any warnings regarding their results.

OPB was one of the leading figures during those years, and he left us a valuable legacy of his knowledge
 
I was (and still am) undecided between "he did cheat" and "he found the ultimate tweaks". I know that OCX had for example a very special windows image back then. And probably a lot of tweaks for the various benchmarks. Sadly OPB didn't want to disclose what he did. Neither in public (understandable) nor to an unrelated third party. Would've helped his case...
 
It's a very gray area and always was. Some 3DMark and many PCMark alterations were obvious cheats like repacking texture archives, changing benchmark DLLs and so on. But some fall within the "general tweak" when a certain technique doesn't speed up only the benchmark but the system as a whole and other software too (like caching, priority, drivers).
This is why I don't like the ban of wPrime dll tweak - it's an official dll and you can change it officially by using different OS versions. Why not allow to change only the dll? Pretty much like changing DirectX version or driver or Java runtime version (legit tweak back in HWBot Prime times).
OCX had some nice tools like Spi tweaker and tutorials. Too bad we can't share some things without the risk of being considered a cheat.
P.S. how I love the rev. 2 HWBot design. More than any else.
 
What i don't like about this specific tweak and its ban is the fact that some old results may (or may not) use the Wprime DLL tweak. So some results are unreachable without "cheating". I'd also preferred that tweak to stay allowed and an official note on the benchmark page how that tweak works and how you apply it. So it's common knowledge and basically anyone can and will use it in the future.
 
Interesting stuff. Although I was one of the earlier to register on HWBot but found AMDMB to be the leading site back then. After a while it became PCPER and some time later HWBot got more popular, but in those times I lost interest for OC for a while. I missed out on things like this because of that.
 
Ich habe vor vielen Jahren mit dem OC aufgehört. Wenn es der Radsport zulässt (denn dieser hat in meinem Privatleben oberste Priorität), probiere ich hin und wieder etwas Hardware aus, die ich noch nicht getestet habe.
Ich habe viel zu viele Dinge, die noch ungetestet sind. Das Schlimmste ist, dass ich keine Zeit habe :wall:

 
Hardwareluxx setzt keine externen Werbe- und Tracking-Cookies ein. Auf unserer Webseite finden Sie nur noch Cookies nach berechtigtem Interesse (Art. 6 Abs. 1 Satz 1 lit. f DSGVO) oder eigene funktionelle Cookies. Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir diese Cookies setzen. Mehr Informationen und Möglichkeiten zur Einstellung unserer Cookies finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.


Zurück
Oben Unten refresh