Vergleichsbench RST 9.6.0.1014 vs 10.0.0.1046
Auf Intel X25-M 160 GB
Alter Treiber 9.6.0.1014
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World :
Crystal Dew World
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 252.750 MB/s
Sequential Write : 111.449 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 191.887 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 109.881 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 18.513 MB/s [ 4519.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 73.012 MB/s [ 17825.1 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 162.277 MB/s [ 39618.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 101.183 MB/s [ 24702.8 IOPS]
Test : 100 MB [D: 37.2% (44.3/119.0 GB)] (x3)
Date : 2010/11/13 11:00:26
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neuer Treiber 10.0.0.1046
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World :
Crystal Dew World
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 252.547 MB/s
Sequential Write : 110.526 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 194.599 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 109.644 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 15.661 MB/s [ 3823.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 72.903 MB/s [ 17798.5 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 163.899 MB/s [ 40014.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 99.189 MB/s [ 24216.1 IOPS]
Test : 100 MB [D: 37.2% (44.3/119.0 GB)] (x3)
Date : 2010/11/13 11:08:06
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64)
Der alte Treiber ist komischerweise besser.
JZ bietet allerdings auch schon den neuen an:
Computertechnik JZelectronic
Wollte nochmal den Unterschied messen, bevor ich jetzt meine neue C300-256GB einbaue