RC5-72 Offtopic Thread

[Carsten1986]

stell ein das er nur eine wu cruncht dann hast du deine 6 Mkeys und dank HT hast du nur 50% CPU Auslastung

kann dir gerne mal nen taskmanager scren amchen mit rc5 daneben
hab bei beiden cpus volle auslastung
und dc´netc.exe hat immer zw. 95-97 cpu-auslastung laut prozessmanager

 

[$ilver]

@ carsten .. welchen core benutzt du ?

 

[Carsten1986]

@ carsten .. welchen core benutzt du ?

ka die ini is von termi gemacht

 

[MarvXP]

endlich geht der §()=//(§$§!!°!" HW LuXX Server wieder

 

[MarvXP]

@Silver

das Passwort für das Girlalbum bitte

 

[Carsten1986]

@Silver

das Passwort für das Girlalbum bitte

dito

ka was das is aber
girlalbum

 

[$ilver]

ka die ini is von termi gemacht

loooooool

dann crunsht du mit nem athlon core tu mal alle cores und rc5 benchen ..

 

[Terminator]

...seit wann stellt man in der ini den Core ein? ...

 

[$ilver]

ka war nur son spontaner gedanke ... muhaha

 

[Carsten1986]

[Dec 20 18:09:47 UTC] RC5-72: using core #0 (SES 1-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:10:08 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #0 (SES 1-pipe)
0.00:00:17.53 [2,650,363 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 18:10:08 UTC] RC5-72: using core #1 (SES 2-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:10:27 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #1 (SES 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.84 [3,967,850 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 18:10:27 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (DG 2-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:10:46 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (DG 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.64 [2,986,243 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 18:10:46 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (DG 3-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:11:06 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (DG 3-pipe)
0.00:00:16.28 [4,407,312 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 18:11:06 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (DG 3-pipe alt).
[Dec 20 18:11:25 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (DG 3-pipe alt)
0.00:00:16.93 [3,696,292 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 18:11:25 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (SS 2-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:11:44 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (SS 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.26 [3,125,085 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 18:11:44 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (GO 2-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:12:03 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (GO 2-pipe)
0.00:00:17.04 [3,976,830 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 18:12:03 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (SGP 3-pipe).

 

[Carsten1986]

[Dec 20 18:12:03 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (SGP 3-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:12:23 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (SGP 3-pipe)
0.00:00:16.71 [5,826,587 keys/sec]
.....10%.....20%.....30%a....40%.....50%...b

 

[$ilver]

also stell core 3 +2 cruncher ein und du hast 8,8mkeys ..

 

[$ilver]

[Dec 20 18:12:03 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (SGP 3-pipe).
[Dec 20 18:12:23 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (SGP 3-pipe)
0.00:00:16.71 [5,826,587 keys/sec]
.....10%.....20%.....30%a....40%.....50%...b

oder eben core 7 ...

 

[Carsten1986]

[Dec 20 18:13:33 UTC] OGR-P2: using core #0 (GARSP 6.0-A).
[Dec 20 18:13:52 UTC] OGR-P2: Benchmark for core #0 (GARSP 6.0-A)
0.00:00:16.87 [12,288,854 nodes/sec]
[Dec 20 18:13:52 UTC] OGR-P2: using core #1 (GARSP 6.0-B).
[Dec 20 18:14:12 UTC] OGR-P2: Benchmark for core #1 (GARSP 6.0-B)
0.00:00:16.65 [11,274,371 nodes/sec]

wie genau? einstellen?
unter menu: 3 - cores : dort was schreiben? rc...7 ; o... 0

 

[Carsten1986]

wird der schneller wenn ich auf priority 3 oder so stelle?

 

[Terminator]

...ja und nein... nimmt dann allen anderen Prozessen die Power weg... d.h. du kannst auch nimmer gescheit zocken...

 

[Carsten1986]

...ja und nein... nimmt dann allen anderen Prozessen die Power weg... d.h. du kannst auch nimmer gescheit zocken...

argh laut dem info fenster das auf geht wenn ich mit maus @ symbol @ statusleiste gehe sagt der immernoch ~ 3.000.000

 

[$ilver]

argh laut dem info fenster das auf geht wenn ich mit maus @ symbol @ statusleiste gehe sagt der immernoch ~ 3.000.000

bla. ..lass einfach laufen ..

 

[Carsten1986]

buff-out.r72
[Dec 20 18:17:13 UTC] 2 crunchers ('a' and 'b') have been started.
.....10%.....20%.....30%.....40%.....50%.....60%.....70%.....80%.....90%....100
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72 #b: Completed CA:CD6C21A0:00000000 (1.00 stats ...
0.00:16:15.90 - [1,678,851 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72 #b: Loaded CA:CD6C21A2:00000000:1*2^32
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 80 packets (80.00 stats units)
1.08:10:47.85 - [2,890,517 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72: 89 packets (89.00 stats units) remain in
buff-in.r72
Projected ideal time to completion: 1.07:37:11.00
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72: 122 packets (122.00 stats units) are in
buff-out.r72
.....10%.....20%.....30%.....40%.....50%.....60%.....70%.....80%.....90%....100
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72 #a: Completed CA:CD6C21A1:00000000 (1.00 stats ...
0.00:35:05.04 - [1,291,981 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72 #a: Loaded CA:CD6C21A3:00000000:1*2^32
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 81 packets (81.00 stats units)
1.08:29:37.42 - [2,885,855 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72: 88 packets (88.00 stats units) remain in
buff-in.r72
Projected ideal time to completion: 1.07:15:52.00
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72: 123 packets (123.00 stats units) are in
buff-out.r72
.a...10%.....20%.....30%.....40%....b

wiso hab ich immer noch nur ~3.000.000

 

[$ilver]

buff-out.r72
[Dec 20 18:17:13 UTC] 2 crunchers ('a' and 'b') have been started.
.....10%.....20%.....30%.....40%.....50%.....60%.....70%.....80%.....90%....100
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72 #b: Completed CA:CD6C21A0:00000000 (1.00 stats ...
0.00:16:15.90 - [1,678,851 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72 #b: Loaded CA:CD6C21A2:00000000:1*2^32
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 80 packets (80.00 stats units)
1.08:10:47.85 - [2,890,517 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72: 89 packets (89.00 stats units) remain in
buff-in.r72
Projected ideal time to completion: 1.07:37:11.00
[Dec 20 18:33:29 UTC] RC5-72: 122 packets (122.00 stats units) are in
buff-out.r72
.....10%.....20%.....30%.....40%.....50%.....60%.....70%.....80%.....90%....100
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72 #a: Completed CA:CD6C21A1:00000000 (1.00 stats ...
0.00:35:05.04 - [1,291,981 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72 #a: Loaded CA:CD6C21A3:00000000:1*2^32
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 81 packets (81.00 stats units)
1.08:29:37.42 - [2,885,855 keys/s]
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72: 88 packets (88.00 stats units) remain in
buff-in.r72
Projected ideal time to completion: 1.07:15:52.00
[Dec 20 18:52:19 UTC] RC5-72: 123 packets (123.00 stats units) are in
buff-out.r72
.a...10%.....20%.....30%.....40%....b

wiso hab ich immer noch nur ~3.000.000

weil dein pimmel so klein is

ne keine ahnung

 

[Riverna]

weil dein pimmel so klein is

ne keine ahnung

wenns danach geht dürfte ich nichmal 1.000.000 haben

 

[Carsten1986]

wenns danach geht dürfte ich nichmal 1.000.000 haben

no cemment

echt keiner ne idee?

 

[Carsten1986]

[Dec 20 19:07:25 UTC] RC5-72: using core #2 (DG 2-pipe).
[Dec 20 19:07:45 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #2 (DG 2-pipe)
0.00:00:17.18 [2,981,899 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 19:07:45 UTC] RC5-72: using core #3 (DG 3-pipe).
[Dec 20 19:08:06 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #3 (DG 3-pipe)
0.00:00:17.67 [4,204,899 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 19:08:06 UTC] RC5-72: using core #4 (DG 3-pipe alt).
[Dec 20 19:08:25 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #4 (DG 3-pipe alt)
0.00:00:16.73 [3,597,670 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 19:08:25 UTC] RC5-72: using core #5 (SS 2-pipe).
[Dec 20 19:08:44 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #5 (SS 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.51 [3,033,749 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 19:08:44 UTC] RC5-72: using core #6 (GO 2-pipe).
[Dec 20 19:09:03 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #6 (GO 2-pipe)
0.00:00:16.98 [3,976,830 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 19:09:03 UTC] RC5-72: using core #7 (SGP 3-pipe).
[Dec 20 19:09:23 UTC] RC5-72: Benchmark for core #7 (SGP 3-pipe)
0.00:00:16.65 [6,125,933 keys/sec]
[Dec 20 19:09:23 UTC] OGR-P2: using core #0 (GARSP 6.0-A).
[Dec 20 19:09:43 UTC] OGR-P2: Benchmark for core #0 (GARSP 6.0-A)
0.00:00:16.86 [13,088,258 nodes/sec]
[Dec 20 19:09:43 UTC] OGR-P2: using core #1 (GARSP 6.0-B).
[Dec 20 19:10:03 UTC] OGR-P2: Benchmark for core #1 (GARSP 6.0-B)
0.00:00:17.03 [11,568,369 nodes/sec]

das sin die benchs nun stell ich ein:
Core selection:

This option determines core selection. Auto-select is usually best since
it allows the client to pick other cores as they become available. Please
let distributed.net know if you find the client auto-selecting a core that
manual benchmarking shows to be less than optimal.
Cores marked as 'n/a' are not applicable to your particular cpu/os.

RC5-72:-1) Auto select 0) SES 1-pipe 1) SES 2-pipe
2) DG 2-pipe 3) DG 3-pipe 4) DG 3-pipe alt
5) SS 2-pipe 6) GO 2-pipe 7) SGP 3-pipe
OGR-P2:-1) Auto select 0) GARSP 6.0-A 1) GARSP 6.0-B

Default Setting: -1 (auto-detect)
Current Setting: RC5-72=7,OGR-P2=0
New Setting --> RC5-72=7,OGR-P2=0

und
1) Core selection ==> RC5-72=7,OGR-P2=0
2) Number of crunchers to run simultaneously ==> 2
3) Priority level to run at ==> 0 (lowest/at-idle)

 

[m0e]

2) Number of crunchers to run simultaneously ==> 2

setzt das mal auf 1!

 

[Terminator]

...das bringt ja aber von der Performance nix...

 

[Carsten1986]

2) Number of crunchers to run simultaneously ==> 2

setzt das mal auf 1!

will ja mit 2 crunchen
hab ja nicht um sonst HT

 

[m0e]

...das bringt ja aber von der Performance nix...

doch .... also als ich noch nen P4 mit HT hatte war HT langsamer..... zwar nicht viel aber war so...

evtl is es mit den neuen Versionen auch anders....


mfg m0e

 

[MarvXP]

@Silver

Das Passwort ?

 

[Carsten1986]

doch .... also als ich noch nen P4 mit HT hatte war HT langsamer..... zwar nicht viel aber war so...

evtl is es mit den neuen Versionen auch anders....


mfg m0e

aber wenn ich keine 2 gleichzeitig mache dauerts doppelt so lange

 

[MarvXP]

^^heul nicht kleiner sondern probiers aus!