Sparksnl
Enthusiast
So I still got some results. Too bad my best 4 or 5 validation files were corrupt. So 3433MHz is best now (max validated was 3478MHz).
I made an in between screenprint:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81854/81854b07df55cd97e93a284a0ffb51fe1de9f91f" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3414MHz 1.81v (1.76v) - 2x512MB - CPUz.png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3414MHz 1.81v (1.76v) - 2x512MB - CPUz.png"
Max boot was 3300MHz @1.67v. On air I needed 1.50v for a 2903MHz boot.
PI and PIFast:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74596/74596088cd8fe705770adfd8ab7914d53a387bd6" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3215MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - PIFast.png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3215MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - PIFast.png"
Win 7 testing:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4654e/4654e8f0f49563ea1581892497c4af446e615042" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3115MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - WPrime (...png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3115MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - WPrime (...png"
More important tests for me were max FSB on cold. I tested with -62C on my Single Stage head and -53C on the sensor next to the CPU.
Max FSB Boot with cpu watercooled was (LDT/FSB 1.20v / Chipset 1.62v):
LDT/FSB: 3.0x - <440MHz FSB
LDT/FSB: 2.5x - 460MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 2.0x - 460MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 1.5x - Not tested (but most of the time not that good)
Max FSB Boot with cpu at -62C was (LDT/FSB 1.20v / Chipset 1.62v):
LDT/FSB: 3.0x - 335MHz FSB
LDT/FSB: 2.5x - 325MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 2.0x - 340MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 1.5x - 345MHz FSB
So if I analyze these FSB results then to me it looks like this CPU can take a little more cold. 3600MHz would need a 300MHz FSB (multi 12x). That is a 45MHz gap (345 - 300).
And I guess I would not mind going a little further because even more cold could make it more stable at slower speeds. It would just top out earlier for max validated speed in CPUz.
Example: 3400MHz would need a 283MHz FSB. If I could bench all benches on that speed I guess I would be happy loosing a bit top speed. Then I would have a margin of 62MHz (345 - 283).
That way I could possibly give it 20C to 30C extra on cold (so -80C to -90C). In theory...
I made an in between screenprint:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81854/81854b07df55cd97e93a284a0ffb51fe1de9f91f" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3414MHz 1.81v (1.76v) - 2x512MB - CPUz.png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3414MHz 1.81v (1.76v) - 2x512MB - CPUz.png"
Max boot was 3300MHz @1.67v. On air I needed 1.50v for a 2903MHz boot.
PI and PIFast:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57be5/57be58068c9e7c963b8535704e4d84a0a29be507" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3187MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - PI 1M.png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3187MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - PI 1M.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74596/74596088cd8fe705770adfd8ab7914d53a387bd6" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3215MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - PIFast.png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3215MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - PIFast.png"
Win 7 testing:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81722/81722d3da28c2c13a15a517c8075bd0fa7c85190" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3051MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - CB 11.5.png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3051MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - CB 11.5.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fab49/fab495738c0a0bd86c8081e33b701113de52ee34" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3051MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - CB 15.png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3051MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - CB 15.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4654e/4654e8f0f49563ea1581892497c4af446e615042" alt="WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3115MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - WPrime (...png WinXP_NF4_DR_Expert_Athlon 64X2 4600+ (CDBHE E4) - 3115MHz 1.78v (1.760v) - 2x512MB - WPrime (...png"
More important tests for me were max FSB on cold. I tested with -62C on my Single Stage head and -53C on the sensor next to the CPU.
Max FSB Boot with cpu watercooled was (LDT/FSB 1.20v / Chipset 1.62v):
LDT/FSB: 3.0x - <440MHz FSB
LDT/FSB: 2.5x - 460MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 2.0x - 460MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 1.5x - Not tested (but most of the time not that good)
Max FSB Boot with cpu at -62C was (LDT/FSB 1.20v / Chipset 1.62v):
LDT/FSB: 3.0x - 335MHz FSB
LDT/FSB: 2.5x - 325MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 2.0x - 340MHz FSB
LDT/FSB 1.5x - 345MHz FSB
So if I analyze these FSB results then to me it looks like this CPU can take a little more cold. 3600MHz would need a 300MHz FSB (multi 12x). That is a 45MHz gap (345 - 300).
And I guess I would not mind going a little further because even more cold could make it more stable at slower speeds. It would just top out earlier for max validated speed in CPUz.
Example: 3400MHz would need a 283MHz FSB. If I could bench all benches on that speed I guess I would be happy loosing a bit top speed. Then I would have a margin of 62MHz (345 - 283).
That way I could possibly give it 20C to 30C extra on cold (so -80C to -90C). In theory...
Zuletzt bearbeitet: