D
Digg
Guest
Traurigerweise ist das Strix derzeit mein bestes Board für Mem OC.
Aber das wird sich auch irgendwann ändern. Bin ja auf der Suche. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4338/e4338ff30de6747c67048db8f7378de78b6a63b4" alt="zwink ;) ;)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44ada/44adad36beb809f2c1d925ab91d1726dfc0a8ceb" alt="fresse :fresse: :fresse:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4338/e4338ff30de6747c67048db8f7378de78b6a63b4" alt="zwink ;) ;)"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Anmerkung: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Hello, I saw your previous posts. Good to see you here too.Hi @tibcsi0407, how are you? I couln't change my nickname here, I'm lmfodor@OCN.
You had sent me a BIOS config file with 8400, but the curve was not defined at that time. Now I see how you get to 6200MHZ, with 60x2 and TVB +2. Have you set the curve with or without IA_AC/DC?
It is strange, for me 48-40-40-48 RON works the best so far with huge delta, maybe you saw the post about my latest profile. Maybe you should try that too. The RTT's on auto for the moment.The truth is I'm lost, the only progress was achieving a good delta with RTT and RON in Auto, as I had asked you about a while ago on OCN. I thought that the BIOS couldn't train a large delta without defining a RON and RTTs. I used to use RON 40-40 or 40-34/34-40 that Veii had suggested to me, and RTT 40-34-34-34-240-0-0-60-40-40 40-40. I think I'm going to put together a spreadsheet with the values for each scenario, to see where I'm going wrong. What I could do would be to load the XMP profile I, and try to optimize the CPU. It would be 8000 at 1.45V
@Veii suggested it, I believe it is for better transients. Lower points are also very important even tough you don't see them in Hwinfo.About your curve, I didn't understand the double S, I see that the first graph looks pretty good, with a 45 degree angle between 3400 and ~5200. Then in the second graph I see that double S, why should it have that shape?
Let me share the latest config with you soon. Just need to reboot to BIOS and I will upload it.Here I found your old BIOS configuration, from what I see in your HWInfo screenshot you achieve 6200 but a max effective clock of 5701, do you still use this configuration or did you upload 8x58 as you told me?
I also found that you had TVB Voltage optimization disabled. Should I disable them?
Gleichen settings? Noch nicht versucht. Glaube mache das mal am Abend. 8200 lief durch letztes mal bei 1.49 vdd.8200 läuft durch?
sorry got busy wasn't really around much last 2 days but i seen you got some help from @tibcsi0407 - if you still want my v/f curve lmk i use LLC4 and 0.70 for my ACLLHi @Vhypur, I hope you are doing well. I'd like to ask you if you can share me your V/F Offset. We have a very similar V/F factory curve, in my case I have a 14900k SP105, but the V/F are pretty similar. Veii suggested me to use your values. Thanks
Es tut mir leid. Mein Deutch ist nicht stark.Good morning,
I rebuilt my board, CPU and RAM. I have 8000 G-Skill that I can only get to work with 7800. But I've only changed the timings a little, no changes to the power supply yet.
BIOS update is new from Jan/2024. But the latency seems too high to me. If you can/would like to help, please only in German and no endless graphics or anything like that, which only the thread writer himself would understand.
How do I get the 8000 to work and how can the latency be better are my questions.
Thanks in advance.
Hi,Are you running MRC Fastbook and Fast Boot enabled? That seemed strange to me. How do you achieve stability in retraining? For me in version 0080, with MRC and fast boot disabled it seems even very fast. Sometimes I try the ASUS Training Mode which makes it slower...
I have no idea. Anything other than 1.47 MVDDQ is a trouble for me. Still trying to find the way to raise it. I think it's because the BIOS trains skews for 1.47V.Something I haven't been able to discover yet is the value of VDDQ for VDDQCPU. On the other hand, having a similar processor and mobo, the only difference being the memories, which in my case are A-Die XMP 8000 at 1.45, I cannot understand why VDDQ_Mem is so low in the M-die kits that I see, and why they operate with such a low SA. I don't think it's the mems.
Could be your cooling. If Vcore is on edge, cooling is important. You will probably need some mV headroom.My first diagnosis is that for such demanding workloads, without an undervolt, I cannot withstand the transient spikes, for example, when I change from VST to VT3, there is a jump in temperatures, so I am running VST with 313W at 90C, and When changing to VT3 the power package it goes to 96 and then VT3 stabilizes at 86 and goes up. Then when shifting in another transition, it goes to 97 degrees and fails. I'm sure my VF curve has a lot to do with it, since it starts at 730 but then drops to less than 700 at 1400MHz, and goes up fine from there.
I'm already used to waiting for him to train, as long as he trains well I don't worry. My hypothesis is that everything is water cooled with a Closed Loop, at low temperatures, it works differently, better in every way, hence the lower voltages and better results with training. But it's just a hypothesis!Hi,
Yeah, I enabled it after the 4th pass ony Y. So far so good.
I have no idea. Anything other than 1.47 MVDDQ is a trouble for me. Still trying to find the way to raise it. I think it's because the BIOS trains skews for 1.47V.
I still had no time for manual skews, but I believe that's the only way to catch that 8600..
Could be your cooling. If Vcore is on edge, cooling is important. You will probably need some mV headroom.
What kind of AIO do you have right now?
This is much better.I'm already used to waiting for him to train, as long as he trains well I don't worry. My hypothesis is that everything is water cooled with a Closed Loop, at low temperatures, it works differently, better in every way, hence the lower voltages and better results with training. But it's just a hypothesis!
I have a Deepcool LT720 with 3 T30s at 3000 RPMs, with the TR contact frame. Overall it works well, but I can't sustain 350 Power draw, so I'm not looking for 60x.
What do you think of my new curve? I had to add more voltage on the low side and then an undervolt on the high side to achieve the S. My factory V/F starts very low. I will correct points 10 and 11 in the BIOS, they don't appear in OCTool
Anhang anzeigen 973689
Jappsi gleiches...Gleichen settings? Noch nicht versucht. Glaube mache das mal am Abend. 8200 lief durch letztes mal bei 1.49 vdd.
From the shape of the curve it seems good, I applied the values and I couldn't even run CB23, maybe the undervolt is affecting me in the upper part of the curve, I don't think it affects the lower part as much. @Veii I recommend correcting P3, but since I have such a low value from the factory, I have no choice but to give it +30mV or more.This is much better.
VF 11 is always your highest ratio. That's why it shows 60X.
From AIO I would suggest you to try EK CR360, it has very good performance.
Bootet tut er. Manchmal ein 55er. Also ist da noch der Wurm drin. Teste es noch paarmal so nach den Änderungen, ob ein 55er eintrifft. Ich wüsste sonst nicht wo schrauben noch. Ggf spiele ich das neue Bios drauf. Ev habe ich da mehr Glück.Jappsi gleiches...
Wie weit ist das Setting denn bootfähig?
The AC loadline moves every value up or down. So the graph moves parallel, shape remain the same, just with different values.From the shape of the curve it seems good, I applied the values and I couldn't even run CB23, maybe the undervolt is affecting me in the upper part of the curve, I don't think it affects the lower part as much. @Veii I recommend correcting P3, but since I have such a low value from the factory, I have no choice but to give it +30mV or more.
Can you tell me how AC_LL plays to move the curve? If I set 0.6 as you have for LLC4, does that move the curve? I mean, taking into account that the value that OCTool reads for LLC4 is 0.27. I don't quite understand how AC_LL plays with the curve. Thanks!
55 kann leider fast jede Spannung verursachen. Genauso sind Timings möglich.Also meiner Erfahrung nach ist der 55er ein anzeichen von nicht stimmiger SA, IMC. Bei DDR4 wars auch noch ein Zusammenspiel mit den Timings. Vielleicht dort mal ansetzen?
Hat das 1001 schon jmd. getestet?
![]()
ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE | Gaming motherboards|ROG - Republic of Gamers|ROG Global
The ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore supercharges builds with 24+0+2 power stages, hyperspeed DDR5 memory slots, latest PCIe 5.0, and Intel® Wi-Fi 7rog.asus.com
bitte nur deutsch und keine endlosen Grafiken oder ähnliches, die wohl nur der Thraed Schreiber selbst versteht.
Sa kann ich nur tiefer gehen. Werd mal neues bios updateb und versuchen. Gibt ja Leute die fahre. Da 1.19 sa und solches. Muss ja nicht inner 1.25 bzw 1.28 sein.Also meiner Erfahrung nach ist der 55er ein anzeichen von nicht stimmiger SA, IMC. Bei DDR4 wars auch noch ein Zusammenspiel mit den Timings. Vielleicht dort mal ansetzen?
Price is good, but still it's Micron.vs![]()
Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 32GB Kit (16GBx2) UDIMM: OC Gaming Memory Black | CP2K16G60C36U5B | Crucial EU
Buy Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 32GB Kit (16GBx2) UDIMM: OC Gaming Memory Black CP2K16G60C36U5B. FREE US Delivery, guaranteed 100% compatibility when ordering using our online tools.eu.crucial.com
![]()
Crucial Pro 48GB Kit (24GBx2) DDR5-6000 UDIMM | CP2K24G60C48U5 | Crucial EU
Buy Crucial Pro 48GB Kit (24GBx2) DDR5-6000 UDIMM CP2K24G60C48U5. FREE US Delivery, guaranteed 100% compatibility when ordering using our online tools.eu.crucial.com
![]()
That may be the good thingPrice is good, but still it's Micron.![]()