Veii
Enthusiast
- Mitglied seit
- 31.05.2018
- Beiträge
- 1.464
- Laptop
- ASUS 13" ZenBook OLED [5600U]
- Prozessor
- Ryzen 5600X (Dual CCD gimped)
- Mainboard
- ASRock B550 ITX/AX [v2.20]
- Kühler
- Alphacool T38 280mm // Thermalright ARO-M14G
- Speicher
- VIPER PVS416G400C9K
- Grafikprozessor
- GTX1080ti KP [XOC ROM] // EVGA GTX 650 1GB [UEFI GOP]
- Display
- AOC C3279VWF
- SSD
- Samsung EVO 850
- Soundkarte
- Focusrite 2i2 gen2 & AKG P820 // UAD Arrow
- Gehäuse
- Open-Bench
- Netzteil
- Seasonic GX-550
- Keyboard
- Topre Realforce 108UBK 30g [Silenced]
- Mouse
- Endgame-Gear OP1 8K // NZXT Lift 2 Ergo [PAW3395]
- Betriebssystem
- Win11
- Internet
- ▼42 MBit ▲15 MBit
The "needs more, feed it more" partIt can pass everything and CB15 Extreme no issues. I feed it with 1.1208-1.137v under load just for VST/VT3 while it only needs like 1.09-1.1v for 56/44/44
Was that purely by the SVID offset done ?
Or you did also factor it in the loadline
The loadline needs no touch , generally
And this thing is bad
Offset mode doesnt have to start at 0
Cache and so QCLK itself needs to downclock
By it downclocking yet you having high supply voltage for it, will be bad
You did not have high supply voltage in your case, but you dont allow it to clock gate
Basically this will cause instability, due to P-Core Curve limit already forcing a lower voltage state
And because that lower voltage state expects its own Ring Curve state + the stronger throttle due to you giving it even more voltage
All on all, it can be that you have less supply by adding supply vs zero added voltage and letting it remain dynamic.
As that offset messes with curve and that supply increases throttle factor
Soo work:
~ CPU LLC gone,
~ CPU switch freq , well its not needed APEX is tuned well out of the box
~ You only got 100mV delta between VDDQ's. Its too little.
MVDD 1455-1460mV
MVDDQ 1340mV
IVR VDDQ_IMC 1160mV
IVR VDD(2)_CPU 1350